The Value of Taking Risk for Developing Alternative Protein by Startups

Food and Beverages Tech Review | Friday, June 12, 2026

Startups are experimenting with new technology, iterating on existing production methods, and discovering new ways to make increasingly superior products that appeal to customers and benefit the food system

FREMONT, CA: While visiting any major supermarket in the United States, it is evident that conventional animal-based protein goods and their newer alternative protein counterparts coexist. There are gallons of almond milk next to gallons of cow's milk, bottles of plant-based egg products above cartons of chicken eggs, and packages of plant-based meat next to ground beef. Consumer concern regarding the health implications of ingesting high quantities of animal protein, the environmental impact of raising animals for meat, and animal welfare concerns are driving the slow proliferation of alternative protein sources. And adoption is on the rise.

Utilizing never-before-used inputs, procedures, and technologies, the technologies that produce alternative protein products are unlocking new levels of flavor and texture that match those of traditional animal meat products. These plant-based foods have the potential to significantly impact the environment through more efficient food production and overall health by avoiding cholesterol, saturated fat, and other components that contribute to heart disease and other chronic illnesses, and investors have taken notice. The amount of money invested in companies developing sustainable alternatives to conventional animal-based diets is growing.

Stay ahead of the industry with exclusive feature stories on the top companies, expert insights and the latest news delivered straight to your inbox. Subscribe today.

For a greener planet, alternative proteins will overhaul the food system. The global food system profoundly influences the planet's health. The food system contributes to current global greenhouse gas emissions. Animal agriculture is the largest emitter of greenhouse gases of all worldwide emissions, similar to the global transportation sector. The environmental impact of substituting alternative proteins for animal proteins is enormous. To reduce greenhouse gas emissions, adopting alternative proteins has a favorable effect on other food system concerns, such as land shortages and the rise of antibiotic resistance induced by factory livestock farming.

Less cropland is required to produce animals for food. With fewer animals, antibiotics are less needed to prevent disease, hence reducing the number of chemicals in wastewater and food. To fundamentally modify the food system, they must enable innovators in the alternative protein market to research, develop, and introduce innovative products to meet customer demand. To accomplish this, food entrepreneurs in their infancy require funding. Many of the components of food tech startups, such as production technology, molecule and cell development, and fermentation methodologies, are challenging to evaluate at the earliest stages of a company's existence, both in terms of comprehending the significance of new processes or approaches and the viability of large-scale implementation.

More in News

Wastewater treatment has emerged as a critical issue in the poultry industry due to environmental concerns and water scarcity in some parts of the world. Wastewater treatment contributes to a reduction in the water footprint of poultry production. Here are some ways to avoid water scarcity in poultry processing. Fit for reuse and discharge: Meat and poultry facilities have realized the need for a water recycling process and recycled process water to balance rising water prices, reduce wastewater treatment expenses, cut cost municipal wastewater discharge fees, and promote corporate sustainability objectives. Advancements in technology and chemistry have made it increasingly feasible and cost-effective to integrate water reuse into meat and poultry processing operations. In this context, The Wine Club Site reflects how modern production systems are leveraging efficient resource management to support sustainability and operational optimization. These developments enable facilities to adopt more streamlined water recycling practices while maintaining compliance and efficiency. Laws and regulations: Companies that process poultry must adhere to discharge laws in every country, which can change. Governmental mandates are constantly being updated with tighter restrictions on using chemicals, energy, and process waste recycling. Splendor Volcanic Artesian Water delivers sustainable water solutions enhancing resource efficiency and supporting environmental responsibility across food systems Wastewater experience: New technologies in the poultry and meat processing sector not only enhance the quantity of water that can be reused but also lower the amounts of BOD, TSS, and TKN in plant water streams. Discharge of surface water: Local laws in most nations cover discharge into surface waters. The natural purification process follows the initial decontamination phases, which "mechanically" rid the wastewater of large particles, greases, and emulsions. In almost all circumstances, a biological, anaerobic, and aerobic therapeutic step is necessary . Discharge to sewers: Businesses must ensure that any wastewater they produce can be safely disposed of in a sewage system. Fats and coarse particles can clog sewers, causing damage to homes and other businesses that discharge into the same sewer. Inefficiencies in upstream liquid/solids separation : Separation is the process of directing particulates in a flowing stream to one point while directing fluids to another. Solids are often collected in a fixed spot, whereas fluids move continually. The solids should be segregated; they must be inorganic, insoluble, distinct particles with a greater density than the continuous fluids. While maintaining high uptime operability, a liquid/solid separation system must be constructed to be heavy-duty, robust, user-friendly, tool- and mechanic-friendly, run with low maintenance, and have an effective clean-in-place (CIP) system. Sanitary zero-maintenance: This method will reduce labor costs. Many manufacturing providers provide industrial cooking and cooling equipment and liquid-solid separation for the food and beverage industries, creating sanitary zero maintenance. ...Read more
Cooking oil filtration is purchased as a consumable, but its economics are decided by behavior at the fryer. A restaurant can buy high-quality media and still lose money when staff skip daily filtration or use inconsistent amounts of filter powder. The resulting exposure exceeds the price of the media itself. Oil turns over faster, while fried food can carry more grease and lose consistency. Daily execution becomes a serious buying issue. Filtration routines have to survive shift changes and uneven training without adding another complicated task to the kitchen. Products that rely on accurate powder measurement leave room for underuse or overuse, while skipped dosing creates an additional failure point. A format that fixes the filtration dose within the media reduces that variability and gives management teams a clearer way to monitor whether the process is actually being followed. Filtration performance also deserves closer scrutiny than particle removal alone. Crumbs and suspended fines matter, but buyers should examine how the media handles chemical impurities and how much usable oil is retained during the process. Some filtration materials trap contaminants by absorbing oil along with them, increasing the amount that must be added back to restore the fryer level. Media that adsorbs impurities while limiting oil retention changes that equation. Across a large restaurant estate, small differences in add-back can compound into a significant purchasing expense. “Gycor International’s filtration approach uses adsorption to capture impurities while limiting the amount of oil carried away with the media, which can reduce add-back compared with more absorptive methods.” Equipment fit is another practical test. Restaurant groups often operate mixed fryer fleets, particularly after remodels or acquisitions. A filtration program becomes harder to standardize if media is available for only a narrow range of machines. Buyers should look for compatible sizes across common fryer configurations and for a supplier model that can keep product moving through existing restaurant purchasing channels. Availability matters most when a product is meant to be used every day. Broad compatibility also reduces the likelihood that a new fryer or replacement filter machine forces a location into a separate consumables routine. Unit-price comparisons need the same discipline. Plain filter paper may appear economical, while a powder-assisted medium carries a higher purchase price. The better comparison is total oil consumption over the replacement cycle. A lower-cost filter that extends oil life less effectively can create a false saving. Management teams should judge filtration media against oil usage and add-back requirements, then weigh whether the format improves daily execution enough to protect those economics across locations. Gycor International merits consideration as a premier choice under this buying logic. Its cooking oil filtration line spans plain filter paper and powder-based media. Fri-MOR Filter Powder is available in bulk, while its filter powder pad incorporates the powder directly into the paper medium. The pad creates a one-step daily format that reduces dosing inconsistency in restaurant filtration routines. Its filtration approach uses adsorption to capture impurities while limiting the amount of oil carried away with the media, thereby reducing add-back compared with more absorptive methods. Gycor also offers pad sizes for a broad range of fryer and filter-machine configurations. For restaurant groups prioritizing consistent use and oil control, it merits serious consideration. ...Read more
All aspects of a restaurant's operations are included in restaurant management . As a manager, one is responsible for hiring and training staff, collaborating with the owner, processing payroll, marketing the business, managing inventory, maintaining the building, handling unexpected situations, and ensuring customer satisfaction.  The Significance of Restaurant Management:  Good restaurant management ensures that supplies are stocked, employees are paid on time, employees are scheduled appropriately, and customers are rewarded for loyalty. In order to achieve long-term success, all of these tasks must be accomplished.  If there are any glitches in the restaurant's operations, it can prevent it from making its customers happy. Restaurant management can make all the difference between success and failure. Restaurant management basics:  Every restaurant manager should follow certain best practices. As part of these efforts, healthy relationships among staff must be maintained, inventory should be tracked, open communication with the owner must be maintained, and costs must be kept low. Management of restaurant inventory:  The primary objectives of restaurant inventory management are developing good relationships with vendors, regularly taking stock of restaurant supplies, and encouraging employees to be aware of goods. It can be daunting to manage a restaurant's inventory list: food, beverages, liquor, kitchen appliances, tableware, paper products, and miscellaneous items like light bulbs.  Restaurant management ensures that the restaurant remains stocked at a reasonable price and avoids mistakes that could lead to deficiencies. Restaurant inventory management software is available from a number of reputable companies. Using these platforms, restaurant owners and managers can identify areas where food or other supplies are wasted. Together, they can devise ways to prevent future waste. The restaurant manager and owner will also investigate vendors to find those that offer the best price without compromising quality. Expert restaurant management doesn't let bills go unpaid with their inventory management software. Costs of labor:  Full-time and hourly employees are included in labor costs. Labor costs may also include benefits, overtime, or paid time off, depending on the restaurant's operations. It is done by dividing the total wages by the total sales to calculate labor costs.  Rent, utilities, labor, technology expenses, maintenance, and more are all part of a restaurant's budget. Restaurant management must work hard to keep costs low and profits high.    ...Read more
Food waste often starts with a simple mismatch. A kitchen prepares more than customers need. A retailer orders more than it can sell. A product reaches its use-by date before anyone buys it. Each instance may seem minor, but across a restaurant, foodservice operation, manufacturer or retail network, those losses can become significant. Many businesses still rely on manual counts, staff observations and end-of-day records to track food loss. These methods have their place, but they do not always tell the whole story. By the time something is recorded as waste, the decision that led to it may have happened days or even weeks earlier. Technology is giving businesses a better view of that process. Inventory systems, forecasting tools, connected equipment and waste-tracking platforms can show what is being purchased, what is being used and what is ending up in the bin. Making Waste Visible The first step in reducing waste is realizing what is being wasted and why. That sounds simple, but connecting discarded food to a particular product, process or decision is not always easy. Waste-tracking systems can give staff a way to record what is being thrown away and the reason for it. Once that information builds up, patterns become easier to spot. A restaurant might discover that certain ingredients are regularly over-prepared. A retailer may find that particular products are consistently left unsold near their expiration dates. A manufacturer could uncover losses at one stage of production. A total waste figure does not tell a manager much on its own. Knowing where that waste comes from is far more useful because it points to something that can be changed. The same applies to inventory. Up-to-date information on stock levels, product movement and shelf life can help purchasing and operations teams make decisions before food reaches the point where it has to be discarded. Matching Supply with Demand Overproduction is a familiar problem across the food industry. Businesses need enough food to meet demand, but demand is rarely predictable. Weather, seasonality, promotions, local events and customer habits can all change what people buy. By looking at past sales and other relevant information, these systems can help businesses estimate how much food they are likely to need. They will not predict every customer decision, but they can provide a stronger starting point than relying on instinct alone. “A total waste figure does not tell a manager much on its own. Knowing where that waste comes from is far more useful because it points to something that can be changed.” Inventory, purchasing, production, sales and waste information can tell a much more useful story when viewed together. A business can see what it has, what is selling, what is likely to be left over and where changes need to be made. That can influence decisions throughout the operation. Orders can be adjusted, production can be brought closer to actual demand and products at risk of becoming waste can be identified sooner. Surplus food can also be directed toward another use while it still has value. Some level of waste will always exist because demand cannot be predicted perfectly and food has a limited shelf life. The opportunity is to reduce the avoidable part. For the food and beverage industry, that means looking beyond the amount of food being thrown away and asking a more useful question: why is it happening in the first place? Better data and better-connected technology can help businesses answer that question and make changes before food becomes waste. For a restaurant or foodservice operation, that might mean preparing smaller quantities when demand is expected to be lower. For a retailer, it can support more accurate ordering. A manufacturer can use similar information to better align production with expected sales. Finding Uses for Surplus Food Food that cannot be sold in its original form does not necessarily have to become waste. Depending on the product and local requirements, businesses can redirect surplus through donations, secondary uses, animal feed, composting or other recovery options. The challenge is often timing. Once food has passed the point where it can safely or practically be used, those options disappear. Technology can help businesses identify surplus earlier and keep track of what is available. Better coordination can also make it easier to connect usable food with organizations that can put it to work. That changes the role of waste management. Instead of treating disposal as the automatic final step, businesses can look at whether there is another practical destination for food before it reaches that point. For this to work, recovery has to fit into normal operations. Staffs need clear procedures, and businesses need a reliable way to identify, sort and move surplus food while it is still usable. Connecting Waste to the Bottom Line There is an environmental cost to food waste, but the financial impact is just as direct. When food is thrown away, the business also loses the money spent on ingredients, transportation, storage and labor. Once a company knows where food is being lost, it can look at what is driving that loss. It might be inaccurate forecasting, oversized portions, poor storage practices or a production step that creates more waste than expected. Those findings can change the conversation around technology. The case for investing in waste-reduction tools is not simply about producing sustainability metric. It is about finding where money and resources are being lost and deciding whether the process can be improved. Building a More Connected Food System Technology will not solve food waste on its own. A forecasting system cannot compensate for poor inventory practices, and a waste-tracking platform is of little use if employees do not record information consistently or act on what it shows. ...Read more
Top